Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The later stuarts

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 05:27, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The later stuarts

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously speedily deleted by me for being redundant to existing articles (House of Stuart and articles about individual monarchs). This was chalenged by the article's creator, so I am bringing it to a full debate. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 12:27, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Seems entirely redundant of existing pages. JohnInDC (talk) 13:34, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 01:21, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and think about a redirect to House of Stuart if necessary. I seem to recall a textbook I used years ago at school with this title, but we've got the subject matter covered fine. Blue Square Thing (talk) 14:09, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.